What does Finrep do for SEC reporting teams?

Finrep provides purpose-built workflows for SEC reporting including roll-forward analysis, peer alignment benchmarking, comment letter risk detection, filing readiness checks, and AI-assisted disclosure drafting — all grounded in evidence and peer precedent.

How does Finrep help with 10-K and 10-Q drafting?

Finrep's Disclosure Drafting workflow drafts or refines 10-K and 10-Q sections using peer precedent, prior period language, and applicable ASC guidance as grounding sources. Every output is traceable to its source.

Can Finrep help respond to SEC comment letters?

Yes. Finrep's Comment Letter Response workflow drafts substantive, defensible responses to SEC staff comment letters by referencing peer company responses and applicable accounting guidance.

What workflows does Finrep offer for CFO and Controller teams?

Finrep offers Certification Readiness, Cross-Period Consistency, and Board Briefing workflows — covering pre-certification risk summaries, narrative consistency checks, and audit committee-ready disclosure summaries.

Does Finrep support ESG and sustainability reporting?

Yes. Finrep includes ESG Disclosure Benchmark and ESG Regulatory Monitoring workflows, supporting TCFD, SASB, and GRI framework alignment as well as SEC climate disclosure rule tracking.

Which teams in the CFO office does Finrep support?

Finrep supports SEC Reporting, Technical Accounting, Legal Counsel, Investor Relations, Disclosure Committee, CFO and Controller, Tax Team, and ESG Reporting functions.

How is SASB industry sector determined?

By your GICS code or SIC code, cross-referenced against the SASB industry classification. Multi-industry companies can be assessed against multiple SASB standards.

What does "thin" coverage mean for a framework element?

Present in your disclosures but below the depth or specificity the framework standard expects or below the peer median for that element. Shown with the peer language that represents sufficient coverage.

How are gaps prioritized?

By two dimensions: framework priority (required vs. recommended, SEC rule elements weighted for compliance) and peer consensus (percentage of peers covering the element). Highest combined score surfaces first.

Can it benchmark against my prior year disclosures as well?

Yes. Prior year ESG disclosures uploadable for a cross-period comparison alongside the peer benchmark.

Does it cover CDP responses?

Yes. CDP responses parsed and mapped to the framework element taxonomy alongside 10-K ESG sections and sustainability reports.

How are SEC climate rule requirements handled given ongoing regulatory status?

SEC climate rule elements scored against the final rule as adopted. Any regulatory status updates reflected in the framework taxonomy. Elements under legal stay flagged with current status noted.

ESG Reporting

ESG Disclosure Benchmark

ESG disclosure benchmark scores your sustainability disclosures against TCFD, SASB, GRI, and SEC climate rule requirements, compares coverage element by element against your peer set, and ranks gaps by framework priority and peer consensus. Covers your 10-K ESG sections, standalone sustainability report, or CDP response.

4 frameworks

TCFD, SASB, GRI, SEC climate rule

Element-by-element

Peer comparison per framework element

Priority-ranked

Gaps by framework requirement and peer consensus

See sample reports

Sample ESG Disclosure Benchmark Reports

See what a Finrep ESG disclosure benchmark looks like. Download and review the full output.

Today's reality

ESG Disclosure Benchmark without Finrep

Framework compliance checked separately per framework with no unified gap view
Peer comparison done manually for individual frameworks, rarely all four simultaneously
Gaps prioritized subjectively without a framework priority or peer consensus ranking
No single view of where disclosures stand across all four frameworks at once

ESG Reporting · Review

Four frameworks, one peer set, and no single view of where your disclosures stand.

TCFD asks about governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics. SASB asks about industry-specific sustainability topics with quantitative disclosure standards. GRI asks about material impacts across environmental, social, and governance dimensions. The SEC climate rule asks about climate-related risks and their financial effects. Peers are responding to all four simultaneously.

Knowing where your disclosures stand requires mapping your content to each framework's elements, comparing each element against peer coverage, and ranking the gaps by what matters most. Four separate analyses, usually done by different people in different tools.

Without Finrep

Manual process

Framework compliance checked separately per framework with no unified gap view
Peer comparison done manually for individual frameworks, rarely all four simultaneously
Gaps prioritized subjectively without a framework priority or peer consensus ranking
No single view of where disclosures stand across all four frameworks at once

With Finrep

Automated workflow

Single benchmark covering all four frameworks simultaneously
Element-by-element peer comparison for each framework showing aligned, thin, or absent coverage
Gaps ranked by framework priority (required vs. recommended) and peer consensus (how many peers cover it)
Single artifact covering 10-K ESG sections, sustainability report, and CDP response together

From your ESG disclosures to multi-framework benchmark in four steps

Upload your ESG disclosures

Drop your 10-K ESG sections, standalone sustainability report, CDP response, or any combination. Finrep parses and maps content to each framework's element taxonomy.

Define your peer set

Select peers by ticker, GICS, or custom list. Finrep retrieves and parses peer ESG disclosures from the same source types.

Review the element-by-element benchmark

Each framework element shows your coverage status (present and sufficient, thin, or absent) alongside the peer median. Gaps ranked by framework priority and peer consensus score.

Prioritize and strengthen

Address highest-priority gaps: required framework elements with low peer coverage that are absent from your disclosures. Export the benchmark for ESG and disclosure committee review.

What you get

Multi-framework ESG benchmark with element-level peer comparison and priority-ranked gaps

Grid ReportsDisclosure ComparisonAsk Fina

ESG Reporting

What ESG Disclosure Benchmark does at a glance

Team: ESG Reporting
Filing phase: Review
Output: Multi-framework ESG benchmark with element-level peer comparison and priority-ranked gaps
Modules: Grid ReportsDisclosure ComparisonAsk Fina

What changes when four framework assessments arrive as one benchmark

Four-framework element scoring

TCFD (11 recommended disclosures), SASB (industry-specific quantitative and qualitative topics), GRI (material topic disclosures), and SEC climate rule (climate-related risk and financial effect disclosures) assessed simultaneously. Each element scored: present and sufficient, present but thin, or absent. Coverage definition calibrated per framework's own materiality standard.

Element-level peer comparison

For each framework element, peer coverage compared: what percentage of your peer set discloses it and at what depth. Peer consensus score per element shows whether a gap is an outlier or a sector-wide absence. Verbatim peer language surfaced for elements where you are below peer median.

Gap prioritization by framework and peer consensus

Gaps ranked by two dimensions: framework priority (required element vs. recommended vs. voluntary, with SEC rule elements carrying compliance weight) and peer consensus (percentage of peers covering the element). Highest-priority gaps surface first regardless of framework origin.

Multi-source coverage mapping

Content from your 10-K ESG sections, sustainability report, and CDP response mapped together as a single coverage picture. An element addressed in the CDP response but absent from the 10-K is flagged differently from an element absent from all sources. Coverage location tracked per element.

Built for the people who answer to four frameworks and one peer set simultaneously

ESG/Sustainability Lead

Single benchmark across TCFD, SASB, GRI, and SEC climate rule with peer comparison per element. Gaps ranked by what matters most.

SEC Reporting Lead

10-K ESG sections scored against SEC climate rule requirements and peer practice. Coverage gaps identified before the filing routes.

FAQ

TCFD (11 recommended disclosures), SASB (industry-specific topics), GRI (material topic disclosures), and the SEC climate rule (climate-related risk and financial effect disclosures).